Tennessee Autism Plan Stakeholder recommendations for a comprehensive coordinated system of care for children and youth with Autism. Adopted by the Legislative Task Force on Autism Spectrum Disorder in 2015 7: How Families Understand Autism 10: Tennessee State Agencies for ASD 46: Moving Ahead CONTENTS 3: Comprehensive, Coordinated System of Care 7: How Families Understand Autism 8: The State of Autism in Tennessee 10: Tennessee State Agencies for ASD 14: Autism Summit Team 18: Early Identification 22: Service Coordination 26: Information for Families 30: Education 36: Healthcare 40: Aging and Adulthood 46: Moving Ahead 48: Appendices 55: Acknowledgments Comprehensive, Coordinated System of Care: This plan was developed as a part of an Autism State Planning Grant #H6M- MC22711A0 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) of the U.S. De- partment of Health and Human Services and is directed at building a compre- hensive, coordinated system of care to increase accessibility and availability of services for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Through collaboration, Tennessee can develop a strategy focused on address- ing the needs of individuals with ASD and can work to coordinate, streamline, and enhance the public-private part- nerships necessary to provide adequate resources and services. A “system of care” is a coordinated network of community-based services and supports that are organized to meet the needs of children and youth with ASD or related developmental disabilities and their families. A system of care is more of a philosophy than a specific structure, and the Autism Plan approaches the system accordingly. Many entities and agencies play a role in realizing a coordinated, comprehensive system of care. Families and youth work in partnership with public and private organizations to design services and sup- ports that are effective, that build on the strengths of individuals, and that address each person’s cultural and linguistic needs. A system of care helps children, youth, and families function better at home, in school, in the community, and throughout life. The Tennessee Autism Summit Team1 was convened to serve as the planning and advisory council for the Autism State Planning Grant. Building on a foundation of evidence-based and -informed practices and a commitment to developmentally appropriate services and supports, the team developed recommendations for the Tennessee Autism Plan. Parents, individuals with ASD, health care providers, educators, social service professionals, state agencies, researchers and academics all contributed time and expertise to the recommendations laid out in this plan. Planning efforts built on the early work of the SJr 567 committee in 2002, as well as three reports authored by the Tennessee Comptroller’s office of research and Ed- ucation Accountability (orEA) between 2009- 2012.2 The Tennessee Autism Plan is the culmination of the ideas, discussion, data, and talents of a diverse group of Ten- nesseans who are dedicated to improving quality of life for individuals with ASD and their families. In 2015, the the 109th Tennessee General Assembly formed a Legislative Task Force on Autism Spectrum Disorder. This Task Force subsequently voted to adopt the recommendations made in the Tennessee Autism Plan on December 3rd, 2015. System of Care Principles: Tennessee Public Chapter 10623 enumerated the principles of a coordinated system of care for children with special needs. System of Care Principles include: • A comprehensive array of services addressing physical, emotional, social, and educational needs. • Individualized services based on the unique needs and potential of each individual, and guided by an individualized service plan. • Services provided in the least restrictive environment. • Families as full partners in all aspects of planning and delivering services. • Links between agencies and programs with mechanisms for planning, developing, integrating and coordinating services. • Promotion of early identification and intervention that enhances the likelihood of positive outcomes. • Case management or similar mechanisms provided to each indi- vidual to ensure that services are provided in a coordinated and integrated manner that can address changing needs. • Smooth transitions from youth to adulthood with the supports and services needed. • Services responsive to the cultural and linguistic needs of all individuals. How Families Understand Autism: “Some people look past me and don’t take the time to understand autism. I’ve obsessed what it would be like to be normal, and what if I’d known early I had autism.” ~Nicholas Jones Parent representatives at Autism Tennessee like to say: “When you’ve met one child with autism, you’ve met one child with au- tism.” What they mean is that each individual with this diagnosis is unique, and the way it impacts their life may be very different from another with the same diagnosis. Autism impacts more than the day-to-day of that individual, it impacts his or her family and our larger community. Including individual and family perspec- tives is key to understanding autism and the diverse needs of those with this diagnosis. “Autism has affected every aspect of our lives--where we live, worship, where the kids attend school, work situations, social lives, vacations and finances,” Janet Shouse, a mom, describes. “Autism is a team sport, and there’s no room for bench warmers,” says Tammy Vice, a parent. “There are days when I wonder how many more educational, medical insurance and financial battles I can fight.” “We have learned that autism is unpredictable, so we try to be prepared for any- thing,” explains Becky Gore, a parent. “We have been forced to make new dreams-- few in number and very basic. our dreams are things that most people take for granted,” explains Sherree Ann Sauer, a grandparent. Excerpts from the book, “From Heartache to Hope,” by Leisa Hammett and Rebekah Pope.4 The State of Autism in Tennessee: Autism is a complex developmental disability that typically appears in early childhood and affects a person’s ability to communicate, form relationships and respond appropriately to the environment. Autism is one of a spectrum of related disorders that carry names such as As- perger’s Syndrome, Pervasive Develop- mental Disorder – Not otherwise Spec- ified, rett’s Syndrome, and Childhood Disintegrative Disorder. The current con- vention is to label this array of disorders as Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). ASD is defined by a set of symptoms and behaviors that affect individuals differently, to varying degrees and last throughout the lifespan. No single un- derlying cause has been identified, and symptoms range from mild to severe impairments. There is no single medi- cal exam for autism. Instead, behavioral assessments identify symptoms that indicate autism. Some autism disorders may be identified as early as the first few months after birth to any time before the age of three. Typically, research has indicated that a diagnosis at age two can be reliable. However, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Preven- tion (CDC) despite evidence that ASDs can be identified at 18 months or young- er, “many children do not receive a final diagnosis until much older.”5 The prevalence of ASD in the general population has greatly accelerated in recent years. According to the new report from the CDC National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, the prevalence of ASD in children is one in 68, or 14.7 per 1,000 eight year olds. This represents an approximate 30 percent increase between 2008 and 2010.6 Many peo- ple view these data as indicative of an epidemic of ASD. While there is debate about how much of the increase results from increased recognition versus in- creased prevalence, there is no disagree- ment that there are significantly larger numbers who need services to treat and cope with ASD. Demographics: While Tennessee lacks an adequate database for information about people with ASD, there is no indication that the rate is statistically different from national data. In response to a legislative inquiry, the Comptroller of the Treasury offices of research and Education Accountabil- ity (orEA) published an october 2009 report on autism in Tennessee. A signifi- cant statistic from that report shows that from 2001 to 2007, the number of chil- dren and youth receiving autism-related special education services tripled. Based on special education data, the number of Tennessee children classified as hav- ing autism is growing faster than the numbers in any other disability category by a wide margin, showing an average annual increase of 20.8%. 7 In 2000, 1,088 or 0.86% of children ages 3-21 who received special education services in Tennessee were classified as having autism. In 2011-2012, 6,752 or 5.44% of children with disabilities ages 3-21 who received special education services had autism.8 Statistics alone do not come close to describing the scope of the problems faced by children, families, providers, and the state. Families often report that having a child with ASD/DD has a tremendous impact on the family unit. The impact pervades a family’s finances, employment status, recreational activi- ties, community involvement, and other quality of life issues. Families report voluntarily reducing work hours and in some instances resigning from positions in order to provide care for their child.9 It is estimated to cost at least $17,000 more per year to care for a child with ASD com- pared to a child without ASD. Costs stem from health care, education, ASD-relat- ed therapy, family-coordinated services, and caregiver time. For a child with more severe ASD, costs per year increase to over $21,000.10 Children and adolescents with ASD had average medical expenditures that exceeded those without ASD by $4,110– $6,200 per year. on average, medical ex- penditures for children and adolescents with ASD were 4.1–6.2 times greater than for those without ASD. Differences in median expenditures ranged from $2,240 to $3,360 per year with median expenditures 8.4–9.5 times greater.11 The transition to adulthood brings its own challenges. Educational and em- ployment opportunities for individuals with ASD are scarce, even when com- pared to those of individuals with other disabilities.12 Meeting the diverse and complex needs of children and adults with autism and their families poses a major challenge. Tennessee must work toward development and implementa- tion of systems to ensure that individu- als with ASD and other developmental disabilities receive early and timely identification, diagnosis, and interven- tion services. Because of varied needs, no single state agency can accomplish the systems changes required to meet the growing demand for supports and services. TENNESSEE STATE AGENCIES For ASD Individuals identified as having autism may be eligible for a variety of public services based on indi- vidual diagnosis, needs, and age. Numerous agencies and programs are responsible for administering and pro- viding needed services for this popu- lation. Tennessee law designates au- thority and responsibility to at least six state departments. These include the Department of Mental Health, Depart- ment of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Department of Children’s Services, Department of Education, De- partment of Health, Department of Hu- man Services, and the Department of Finance and Administration. No single agency is responsible for overall service coordination. The Comptroller’s reports point out that “over the past decade, attempts have been made to coordinate Tennessee’s departments and services for individuals with developmental dis- abilities,”13 including those with ASD. Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (DIDD) DIDD is responsible for planning and provid- ing services and supports to Tennesseans with intellectual and developmental disabilities. DIDD provides services directly or through contracts with community providers in a va- riety of settings, almost exclusively through Medicaid home- and community-based waiv- ers, or through institutional settings. Despite its authority to provide services to those with developmental disabilities (DD), DIDD only provides these services to those who have a diagnosis of intellectual disability (ID) and who meet TennCare’s level of care eligibility criteria. over the last decade, the department has moved to serving almost exclusively adults. Budgetary constraints severely limit the num- ber of people who are able to be served by the department. There is an ID waiting list that is roughly the same size as the number of individuals currently being served. The number of those on the waiting list does not reflect the need or demand for these services. Individuals with DD such as autism without a co-occurring ID (defined for these purposes as having an I.Q. less than 70) are excluded entirely. The Family Support Program, operated by DIDD, was established by the TN General As- sembly in 1992 and has been funded at ap- proximately 7.2 million dollars for the last 15 years. Family Support is a source of assistance to individuals with developmental disabilities (not necessarily with a co-occurring intellec- tual disability) and their families. With a maxi- mum annual benefit of $4000, Family Support is not a substitute for comprehensive services. However, the program assists approximately 4,200 families, some of whom have ASD, each year with supportive services. Department of Health: The Department of Health is home to a number of initiatives with the potential to yield positive outcomes for Tennessee’s system of care. The Family Health and Wellness Divi- sion is home to a variety of programs that assist children and youth with special health care needs (CySHCN) and their families. The Division provides leadership for maternal and child health efforts, health promotion, and addresses the needs of CySHCN. The Children’s Special Services (CSS) pro- gram may provide coverage for comprehen- sive medical care and other non-medical resources for children with physical disabil- ities from birth to 21 years of age. Diagnostic and financial eligibility criteria must be met to participate in the program. The CSS pro- gram is coordinated through local health departments and provides resources for medical and non-medical services. Service coordination is a component of CSS and may be provided for children with diag- nosed medical needs, however, ASD is not a covered diagnosis. Integrated Community Systems of Services for Children and youth with Special Health Care Needs is an initiative to develop a fam- ily centered network of community-based services to improve access to quality, com- prehensive, and coordinated services that are culturally sensitive for CySHCN and their families in Tennessee, including Autism. A primary goal of this program is to advance the application of family-centered care and Medical Home concepts in healthcare. The Tennessee young Child Wellness Coun- cil (TyCWC) is a new early childhood state team that is evolving from the former Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems State Action Team and the Early Childhood Advi- sory Council. The TyCWC aims to lead the necessary system enhancements that sup- port programs or services to mitigate toxic stress, expand developmental screening, and strengthen systems for improved child care quality in infancy and early childhood. TyCWC is an excellent venue for inter-disci- plinary initiatives. DEPARTMENT oF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES (DMHSAS): The Department of Mental Health Services provides oversight of the statewide system of mental health services for children and youth and their families, and is responsi- ble for statewide planning and program development. The office provides policy guidance, technical assistance and support to child-serving agencies in the develop- ment, and implementation and expansion of statewide programs and services for children and youth with or at risk of men- tal health disorders and their families. This office has experience in the development and implementation of systems of care. It works on an interdisciplinary basis with other groups, most notably the Council on Children’s’ Mental Health. DEPARTMENT oF EDUCATION The mandate for a free appropriate pub- lic education14 makes school the prima- ry source of assistance for children with ASD and other developmental disabil- ities. The Department of Education is a partner with local school systems where children and youth ages 3 through 21 may receive special education services, while infants and toddlers from birth to age 3 may receive early intervention and related services through Tennessee Early Intervention System (TEIS). TEIS services include planning and coordination of in- dividualized services for the family and child, as well as transition assistance to the local school for special education services as necessary. TEIS is vital to a comprehensive system of care, not only for the services and ser- vice coordination provided directly, but also for their role in facilitating points of entry into the system itself. As young children are referred, TEIS is in a unique position to screen and identify develop- mental delays, as well as track the use of screening tools among their referral sources. Local school districts vary widely in size, in their capacity to address the needs of all children and the complex requirements of statutory mandates. Such variability leads to differences in the quantity and quality of ser- vices provided from district to district. The Department of Education has a role in training and technical assis- tance to districts, as well as moni- toring compliance. Teacher training, fi- nance, and guidelines for best practices are other important areas of interest. DEPARTMENT oF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIoN (F&A) Health Care Finance and Administration oversees all of the health care related services in F&A, including TennCare, Tennessee’s Medicaid program. An estimated 50% of Tennessee’s children and youth with ASD are enrolled in TennCare for their primary and acute care health insurance coverage. Tenn- Care’s Long Term Supports and Services Division is responsible for the Medicaid waivers operated by DIDD. There are no current long term services and supports waivers for children, youth or adults with DD who do not have co-occurring ID. As the largest insurance provider for children with ASD, TennCare is the en- tity in Tennessee’s ASD system of care with the greatest capacity to improve access to needed services. Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) therapy is among the most crucial services. While ABA is nominally a covered service by all TennCare Managed Care organiza- tions (MCos), limits on coverage fall far short of the standard set for compre- hensive ABA coverage. DEPARTMENT oF HUMAN SERVICES (DHS) Vocational rehabilitation Services, a part of DHS, is the program that pro- vides employment services to individ- uals with disabilities. It has a Transition from School to Work Program for high school students pursuing post-second- ary education or training or employ- ment. Eligible individuals have access to a range of employment services. Transition and employment issues for youth and young adults with ASD are challenging, and the number of individuals needing specialized services is growing. CoMMUNITY PARTNERS State agencies and families also rely on state, regional, district, and local entities that provide direct services. Additionally, families often rely on services provided by not-for-profit au- tism and disability advocacy groups and University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (Van- derbilt Kennedy Center, UT Boling Center). The Summit Team member- ship reflects a wide range of these entities. AUTISM SUMMIT TEAM The Autism Summit Team is a voluntary partnership of stakeholders across the public, private and nonprofit sectors. It is comprised of more than 65 individuals representing State Agencies, family-based or disability support and advocacy organizations, community service providers and universities as well as many family members and individuals on the autism spectrum1. The team was initially formed when Tennessee’s University Centers on Ex- cellence in Developmental Disabilities at Vanderbilt University and the University of Tennessee hosted the 2009 Summit on Autism for the Southeast region. This Summit brought together leaders from Tennessee, North Carolina, South Caroli- na and Kentucky to discuss the current state of services for young children with or at risk for autism and related disabil- ities. The Summit provided an opportunity for parents, government officials, and healthcare professionals to share con- cerns, ideas and to collaborate. The Tennessee delegation moved forward independently as a standing body after the initial 2009 summit. The Tennessee Autism Summit Team has been in place for five years and served as the planning and advisory council for a federally fund- ed State Planning Grant from 2012-2014. The Summit Team’s goal has been to cre- ate a plan to build, improve and sustain a coordinated system of care for children and youth with Autism Spectrum Disor- ders/Developmental Disabilities. The system of care should be family –cen- tered, based on best practices, and focus on quality improvement. Families need a “one-stop shop” resource for guidance. DATA CoLLECTION PROCESS Jackson, Memphis, Chattanooga, Knox- ville, and Johnson City, it was possible to include communities on both sides of the rural/non-rural divide and in all three of the state’s “grand divisions.” The Summit Team’s Planning Council, es- tablished to lead this planning project, chose to adopt a two-fold assessment ap- proach that would yield both qualitative and quantitative data. Most of the quan- titative data were provided by the results of a family survey authored and analyzed by Summit Team partners at Vanderbilt University. The survey was designed to provide three levels of information from respondents: demographic information (ethnicity, in- come, level of education); information about the child with ASD (specific be- haviors, age of first concern, and age of diagnosis); and information related to the services received and/or required for the child. over 400 families completed the survey. In order to get a more qualitative repre- sentation of life in Tennessee for a family dealing with ASD, the World Café 15 meth- od of collaborative brainstorming was used to hold a series of Community Con- versations. Partners in each region of Tennessee helped to recruit families and profes- sionals in six communities. By hosting Community Conversations in Nashville, The most significant demographic dispar- ity identified in the family survey was that between rural and non-rural respondents. Families identified a number of challeng- es faced in rural areas.16 of particular con- cern in the results was report of a higher prevalence (10-15%) of co-occurring medical and behavioral conditions in ru- ral children and youth.16 This demographic difference is similarly pronounced in the area of certain services received. This included a lack of ade- quate screening and diagnostic services. Families in rural areas described the chal- lenges they face in obtaining services and supports of all varieties. A two-hour drive for an initial diagnosis is problematic, and a trip the same distance for therapies that require consistent, frequent engagement in order to be effective make them out of reach for many families. other needs specifically identified by our survey include school-based and in-home behavior supports. The survey, as well as testimony during Community Conver- sations, established a relative dearth of parent support groups and parent work- shops. The foremost needs identified through anecdotes from both the survey and Community Conversations relate to diag- nostic issues, specifically the amount of time between initial parental concern and eventual diagnosis. When services are available and ob- tained, families are for the most part satisfied with them. However, service coordination, though rated by 89.9% of respondents as “very important,” was only received by 5.9% of respondents.17 While the need for service coordination was established by the Families Survey, family experiences shared during the Community Conversations emphasized their need for an easily accessible entry point for supports, resources, and ser- vices. A common theme across all Com- munity Conversations was the need for a “one-stop shop” resource for guidance.16 THE PLANNING ProCESS The Autism Summit Team members developed mechanisms to analyze the data and identify areas of quality im- provement that would serve as the basis for this plan. The team split into three groups, each responsible for submitting a series of proposed recommendations. These three workgroups convened be- tween quarterly Summit Team meet- ings and focused on discussing struc- tural challenges, successful emerging models, and potential future initiatives. As workgroups were concluding, they reviewed the material they had dis- cussed and developed consensus rec- ommendations. The Summit Team then reviewed these recommendations and identified successful emerging models and subject areas identified as those meriting further study. The product of these discussions was the first outline for a Tennessee Autism Plan. PLAN STRUCTURE The Summit Team workgroups ad- dressed six identified areas of a compre- hensive system of care: Early Identifica- tion; Service Coordination; Information for Families; Education; Healthcare; and Adulthood. The workgroups consid- ered the implications for data, training/ workforce, and financing for the system. For each area, this report outlines the team’s findings, best practices, existing and emerging models, and recommen- dations for addressing gaps and needs. Many of these recommendations focus on indicators of a quality system of care. The most significant demographic dispar- ity identified in the family survey was that between rural and non-rural respondents. Early Identification: Diagnosing an Autism Spectrum Disorder as early as possible is critical. research shows that young children who receive intensive and specialized treatment early experience better out- comes. reducing the amount of time between when parents are concerned about their child’s development and when they receive a diagnosis must be a priority for our state. The 2012 Family Survey found that “al- most one-quarter of parents (23.1%) were concerned before their child reached one year of age, and over 55% before 18 months. Almost half of these parents (46.8%) then discussed their concern with a professional, but only 4.6% of all parents had received an ASD diagnosis by 18 months, and slightly less than 1/3 (32.1%) had received a diagnosis by the time the child was 30 months (or one year later).”17 Furthermore, “relatively few parents were first concerned only after the child was 60 months or older (i.e., 5-years old), but a full 1/3 (33.5%) of all ASD diagno- ses occurred after this 5-year period 43.2% take place after the benchmark age age of 48 months.”17 The CDC defines a number of bench- marks by which populations can mea- sure the screening and early identifi- cation component of a system of care. These include the number of children identified by 24 months, evaluated by 36 months, and enrolled in intervention services by 48 months5. These are very modest expectations. In fact, given that in Tennessee, children are only eligible for early intervention services through age two, we should strive for enrollment well below this age. SCrEENING AND DIAGNoSIS Families must have access to receive appropriate diagnoses of an Autism Spectrum Disorder. SCrEENING TooLS In addition to their families, there is a host of people who provide care for young children in Tennessee. Types of providers include preschool educators, childcare staff and primary care clinicians. This diverse array of providers must have the training to recognize when a child needs to be screened for ASD. Equally critical is that when referred for a screening to a primary care clinician or early interven- tionist, that provider has the training nec- essary and is able to access standardized screening tools needed. Primary care clinicians should screen all children and monitor those with risk factors for developmental problems. Widespread use of screening tools would greatly improve the system of care by in- creasing the number of entry points for families. An online training module with educational resources could be particu- larly effective at reaching all Tennessee providers. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends develop- mental screening tools be incorporated into well-child visits at 9 months, and ASD-specific screening at 18 and 24 months5. Assessment is needed if a child is at high risk for ASD or if symptoms are present.5 DIAGNoSTIC TooLS When screening indicates cause for con- cern,additionaltoolsareusedtodiagnose the presence of ASD. Diagnostic tools rely on two sources of information—parents’ or caregivers’ descriptions of their child’s development and a professional’s obser- vation of the child’s behavior. The prima- ry care provider might refer the family to a specialist for further assessment and diagnosis. referrals to specialized cen- ters are appropriate, but long waits often delay a specific diagnosis. PATHWAy FroM SCrEENING To SErVICES When developmental delays are identi- fied and while families are waiting for di- agnostic services, it is important that care providers make referrals to intervention services. A diverse array of entry points to a system capable of screening and diag- nosing ASD, along with infrastructure to link necessary services are foundations of early intervention. DATA CoLLECTIoN Shared access to records documenting screening, diagnosis, treatment, and ser- vices received could improve coordina- tion of care. System-wide data collection efforts should begin witih tracking the number of children meeting the CDC and developmental milestones. The 2012 Families Survey provided insight into the age at which some chil- dren have been able to access diagnos- tic services.17 Future surveys of families would provide progress reports. EXISTING AND EMErGING MoDELS There are several models that are leading innovation in screening, diagnosis, and service delivery for Tennessee families affected by ASD. They represent a range of operators, including public-private partnerships. Building on their success will widen access to early identification of ASD. CDC TrAINING CUrrICULUM The CDC Act Early Autism Case Training (ACT) Curriculum includes information on identifying, diagnosing, and manag- ing Autism Spectrum Disorders and is available online for free Continuing Med- ical Education (CME) credit, as well as for Nursing (CNE), and Continuing Education (CEU) credits by the CDC. STArT NETWorK In partnership with TennCare, the Ten- nessee Chapter of the American Acade- my of Pediatrics developed the Screen- ing Tools and referral Training (STArT) in 2003. Now funded with assistance from the TN Department of Education through Tennessee Early Intervention Services (TEIS), STArT was designed to help pediatric care providers learn skills and strategies to implement routine de- velopmental screening using standardized screening tools as part of their health care procedures. The program incorporates the CDC Training Curriculum Learn the Signs and Act Early material, and brings medical practices up to speed on screening tools such as the M-CHAT-r, MCHAT-Follow up or STAT18. To date, nearly 2,000 providers have participated in the STArT training. While the STArT program initially trained medical practices and will continue to of- fer training to medical practices across the state, it has expanded to include Tennessee medical school and residency programs. Trainings are provided at no cost and are for anyone who serves the pediatric popu- lation in the State of Tennessee. This public-private partnership offers a strong foundation on which to model a larger statewide implementation of stan- dardized screening tools. “only 4.6% of parents had received an ASD diagnosis by 18 months, and slightly less than 1/3 (32.1%) had received a diagnosis by the time the child was 30 months (or one year later).”17 DEPArTMENT oF HEALTH PILoT ProJECT The Tennessee Department of Health is working to expand points of entry for families to the system of screening and diagnosis through existing service pro- viders. This pilot project incorporates a standardized screening tool into the protocols for nurses at local health de- partments in rutherford and Sumner Counties. The next phase will be a re- view of the findings from conducted screenings, potential modification of the protocol, and a determination as to the feasibility of expanding the program regionally. If the pilot proves feasible, the Tennes- see Department of Health proposes to expand screenings to every local health department by 2015 with train- ing provided by the TN chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. State- wide implementation protocol would increase access for families to receive a diagnosis of ASD. TENNESSEE EArLy INTErVENTIoN SySTEM (TEIS) Increasing awareness about ASD and resources for screening and referral is a shared responsibility of all agencies that serve Tennessee families. TEIS rec- ognized the need for greater aware- ness among their referral sources, and has made increasing referrals a current focus. Should a child be referred for interven- tion services for any reason, particularly if a screening tool has not yet been used by the referral source, TEIS represents an opportunity for the child to receive services. Adding a standardized screen- ing tool to TEIS protocols could increase access for families to receive a diagnosis of ASD. DHS LICENSED CHILD CArE FACILITIES Child care facilities licensed by the Ten- nessee Department of Human Services need training and technical assistance support in identifying children on the spectrum. Two existing organizations which could develop the capacity to pro- vide these are the Child Care resource and referral Network and the Tennes- see Early Childhood Training Alliance. There are eight Child Care resource and referral Network offices across the state which assist child care providers in all 95 counties. The Tennessee Early Childhood Training Alliance offers financial support to those who work in child care and are earning their CDA or Associate’s Degree. Increasing awareness about ASD and resources for screening and referral is a shared responsibility of all agencies that serve Tennessee families. Recommendations: TRAINING • Expand the capacity of existing community providers that serve Tennessee children to recognize the need for an ASD screening. • Train all primary care providers, clinicians and early interventionists to use and have access to standardized screening tools. • Develop an online hub for trainings and resources on early identification. • Primary care physicians must screen all children and monitor those possessing risk factors for developmental problems. SCrEENING AND DIAGNoSIS • Implement universal, localized screenings by establishing a diverse array of entry points to a system capable of screening and diagnosing ASD. • reduce wait times for appropriate diagnosis. TrEATMENT • Expand the existing infrastructure to link families to necessary services when they or their provider have concerns of devel- opmental delay. • Encourage enrollment in early intervention services as soon as possible, even before a formal diagnosis has been given. A documented delay is a sufficient criterion for TEIS enrollment. DATA • Facilitate sharing of health records documenting at what age a child has been screened, diagnosed, and enrolled in services. • Collect data on the number of children meeting the CDC developmental mile stones. • Continually survey families to evaluate progress. SERVICE COORDINATION Service Coordination is a central, unifying component of an effective system of care for children and youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Children and youth with ASD and their fam- ilies often require a broad array of develop- mental and behavioral services based on age and functional level. Their needs often straddle the medical, behavioral health, social, and education systems. Navigating service systems “poses additional chal- lenges for families already dealing with a fragmented system of health care where specialty services are not coordinated with primary care or other community-based services, and coverage for services is not comprehensive.”17 The 2012 Family Survey found that a major- ity of families, even when they expressed overall satisfaction with services, need ad- ditional service coordination.17 Service coordination, though rated by 89.9% of Family Survey Respondents as “very important,” was only received by 5.9% of respondents.17 Effective service coordination reflects the central role of families, prioritizes child and family concerns, and addresses strengths and needs. In addition to identifying and meeting individual child and family needs, service coordination builds family capacity. The need for effective communication be- tween providers is especially pronounced during transitional periods of an individu- al’s life. The system of care for ASD must include service coordination with the flexibility to meet changing needs across an individual’s lifespan. EXISTING AND EMErGING MoDELS EArLy INTErVENTIoN Best practices and outcomes of good ser- vice coordination are evident in early inter- vention. The Tennessee Early Intervention System (TEIS) is the most formalized model of service coordination in our state. Service Coordination is a central service provided by TEIS to families of infants and toddlers with disabilities or at risk of disabilities, including ASD. An Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is created by the parents, an early in- terventionist, service coordinator, and other team members based on the diverse needs of the child. Service coordination emphasiz- es assisting children and families within their natural routines, activities and culture. MEDICAL HOME Tennessee has joined the national trend toward imple- menting the Medical Home model of health care deliv- ery. A key feature of medical home is coordination of care across the domains of a patient’s life. “The medical home is best described as a model or philosophy of primary care that is patient-centered, comprehensive, team- based, coordinated, accessible, and focused on quality and safety. It is a philosophy of health care delivery that encourages providers and care teams to meet patients where they are, from the most simple to the most com- plex conditions.”19 The Tennessee Department of Health is the leader in the implementation of medical home in our state. The de- partment is partnering with the Tennessee Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and, among others, Family Voices of Tennessee, to provide education and training for families and health care providers on medical home. INTEGrATED CArE MoDEL Some health systems in Tennessee are implementing service coordination by adopting an integrated care model. The integrated care model supports primary and behavioral healthcare integration in the clinical set- ting as a means for delivering quality care and improv- ing overall health outcomes. In practice, this means that different providers may work with a family in the same clinic during the same visit. A pediatrician may access an occupational therapist and consult the child and family together. RECoMMENDATIoNS Increase the use of medical home across all health care systems that serve individuals with ASD. Include training on collaboration and coordination in family and professional educa- tional programs. Explore innovative approaches to increasing the availability of service coordination for families and individuals with ASD. INForMATIoN For FAMILIES: Families are the most critical support for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Effective systems of care inform and engage families in deci- sion-making, service delivery, and care coordination. Tennessee’s principles for a system of care3 and the U.S. Healthy People 2020 objectives20 clearly identify the need for culturally appropriate, family-centered assistance and support for families. Input from the from the Community Con- versations further emphasizes the need for a region- based, family-centered resource guide with a user-friendly online presence.16 Evidence shows that effective systems of service are those that include in- formed families and youth, engage families as partners and agents of change, and provide effective resources and supports. When families have access to the information, resources, and assistance they need, they report being able to better partner in decision-making, navigate services, and are more confident about getting the health care services that their child needs.21 outreach efforts and resources must be culturally and linguistically appropri- ate in order to bridge outcome disparities across rural and urban areas, ethnic minority groups, and for families who are identified as having a low socio-eco- nomic status.21 DATA CoLLECTIoN Using the Family Survey as a baseline, data on availability of services, availability of information and resources, satisfaction, and impact should be collected. This is an area where public-private partnerships could be brought to bear. Moni- toring access, use and effectiveness could strengthen and improve the system of care. one of Tennessee’s strongest assets in addressing needs of families affected by Autism Spectrum Disorders is support from other families. A robust set of family-based organizations represents the front lines in our state’s system of care. This system supports Tennessee’s family-based ASD service providers and peer groups. EXISTING AND EMErGING MoDELS Family-based organizations have a unique ability to connect with other families affected by ASD based on shared experiences. Emerging models of supportive programs for Tennessee families affected by ASD emphasize resource and information networks. They are family-centered, provide accessible materials, and have a vibrant online presence. easily navigable and frequently updated. Through Pathfinder, Camino Seguro iden- tifies multilingual offerings of agencies and resources across the state. Pathfinder works to ensures that all resources listed are relevant, culturally competent, and rep- resentative of best practices. Through the Summit Team, Pathfinder has developed a partnership with Autism Tennessee to expand an information infra- structure: the Autism Portal. A part of the Pathfinder website, this autism-specific site is designed to respond to the needs ex- pressed by families dealing with ASD. The site has general information on autism as well as a regularly updated resource direc- tory. Ideally, this guide will be more com- prehensive as the partnership between Pathfinder and Autism Tennessee develops. KIDCENTrAL TN Autism Tennessee, formerly the Autism So- ciety of Middle Tennessee, staffs Parent representatives who provide one-on-one assistance and peer support. Autism Ten- nessee and its sister organizations in East and West Tennessee also provide training, advocacy, information, referrals and techni- cal assistance. Family Voices of Tennessee operates a Family to Family Health Information Center funded by the Health resources and Ser- vices Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Through this program, Par- ent and Family Navigators educate other parents and health care providers about available family-centered resources includ- ing tools such as the medical home model. Family Voices of Tennessee is also part- nering with the Tennessee Department of Health, Family and Child Wellness Division to develop a Parent-to-Parent Matching Program. This program facilitates one-to- one connections for parents with children who have special health care needs includ- ing ASD. TENNESSEE DISABILITY PATHFINDER Direct access to comprehensive, objec- tive information, and resources in their local area helps families. Tennessee Dis- ability Pathfinder is a statewide clearing- house of disability-related resources and services for persons with disabilities. The program has an expansive website that is Governor Bill Haslam’s Children’s Cabinet launched an online listing of state-oper- ated and state-funded programs in 2014. The kidcentral tn State Services Directory displays all of the services and programs offered in the website-user’s area. Fami- lies can also view all services available that match a keyword search such as “autism.” A marketing campaign by the state to pro- mote kidcentral tn continues to spread the word about this expansive directory. Where Tennessee Disability Pathfinder and the Autism Portal include only material rel- evant to families with disabilities and ASD, kidcentral tn represents all state funded and operated services for children and fam- ilies. Although it has a less specific focus, kidcentral tn is a central hub that is posi- tioned as an entry point for all state service systems and for all Tennessee families. RECOMMENDATIONS: Provide families with direct access to comprehensive, objective information and resources in their local areas. Empower families and youth to be full partners in decision-making. Support and strengthen collaborations between Tennessee’s family-based ASD service providers and peer groups. Increase the accessibility and availability of peer support, information and referral services. Improve community awareness of all existing sources of objective, culturally, and linguistically appropriate, user-friendly resources and information. EDUCATION No two children with ASD have identical needs. Not only are individuals impacted by different conditions on the spectrum, but their range of symptoms and out- comes differ. Additionally, an individual may have a diagnosis of ASD and other co-occurring conditions or disabilities. The goal of educational programs for all students, including students with ASD, is a life with independence and purpose in the community. reaching this goal requires an education based on the indi- vidual needs of the child. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees early intervention services (Part C) for children ages birth through two years and special education services “Although every new school year has brought a flurry of calls and emails from the school expressing concerns or seeking my input, the most difficult periods in my parenting life have come when my son has begun at a new school: his first year of preschool, in first grade, and last year when he began at a new middle-high school. During each of these adjustment periods, there has been a sense of crisis, a pervasive urgency for the first few months of school.” The Individualized Educational Program (IEP) process prescribed by the IDEA presents opportunities for cooperation and coordination between the families, educators and other professionals in the child’s life. IEPs should include not only academic goals but address the needs of the whole child, including health and mental health, behavioral health, life skills, and healthy relationships as well. Integration and coordination between the school and the other systems in a child’s life are critical. Families and youth are key partners in developing and implementing mean- ingful and successful IEPs. An effective education program and IEP team for stu- dents with ASD requires the expertise and input of family members (including the student) and staff from multiple dis- ciplines trained to understand the impli- cations of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Transition planning and implementa- tion, from early intervention and pre- school to elementary, as well as from secondary to post-secondary education and life after school, are important com- ponents of the child’s education. Early strategic transition planning for adult- hood, including academic, vocational, social and medical issues needs to start no later than middle school age. TRAINING Pre-service, disability-specific education for general education teachers is not typically addressed by post-secondary programs in Tennessee. The principles of integration, inclusion, and least restric- tive environment mean that all class- room teachers will have some responsi- bility for the education of students with ASD at various points throughout his or her career. Pre-service training specific to meeting the educational needs of stu- dents with Autism Spectrum Disorders should be included in post-secondary curricula for general and special educators. Teachers should have ongoing in-service training and support to meet the education- al needs of students with ASD and to coor- dinate care with family and outside service providers. Educators benefit from internal support through team-building, mentoring, and coaching, as well as access to resources. Paraprofessionals and others may spend a significant amount of time assisting students with ASD during the school day. Training and resources specific to ASD must be available and accessible to paraprofes- sionals. Families and youth are partners in educa- tion. They need training and information to be effective. These IEP team members also need access to quality information, training, and resources that prepare them to be equal partners in designing and implementing quality, effective educational programs. EXISTING AND EMERGING MODELS Training: Private-Public partnerships can strengthen and improve access to training for school- based personnel, families, and students. one such partner is the Treatment and research Institute for Autism Spectrum Disorders (TrIAD) at the Vanderbilt Kennedy Center. TrIAD partners with the Department of Ed- ucation and local school districts to provide training for a variety of professionals. TrIAD provides teacher training in several formats. Several Basic online Training Sessions (BoTS) are available as well as pre-recorded training sessions that can be downloaded at any time. Tennessee teachers can also schedule in-person trainings based on specific topics (e.g. communication or behavior). In-depth, localized trainings and consulta- tion services are available at the system or individual school level. At the school district level, TrIAD engages in Autism Program Evaluations to work with teachers and ad- ministrators on strengthening school pro- grams for students with ASD. In addition to TrIAD at the Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, the University of Ten- nessee Boling Center on Developmental Disabilities is another important partner for both pre-service and in-service training of multi-disciplinary professionals, paraprofes- sionals, and families. TrAINING rESoUrCES For FAMILIES Support and Training for Exceptional Parents (STEP, inc.), is Tennessee’s Parent Training and Information Center. Partner- ing with the Department of Education and other parent-based groups, STEP provides parent-centered services to help families become active participants in their child’s education. Through workshops and train- ings, conferences and institutes as well as one-on-one assistance, STEP’s statewide reach is an important resource for families of children and youth with ASD as well as other disabilities. I pray about the IEP. I meditate. Nothing can prepare me for those meetings. ~Parent of a child with ASD. TRAINING RESOURCES For STUDENTS The Arc Tennessee’s Secondary Transition Project helps students, families and educa- tors understand the secondary transition process, see possibilities foradult life, and become aware of resources available to help make the student’s dreams come true. Their Student-Directed IEP trainings use several tools to help students take a leadership role in the planning process. EDUCATION REFORM Changes and developments in public ed- ucation require the involvement of those who understand educational supports and services for children with ASD. Implemen- tation of the new Common Core Standards have implications for students with ASD and other disabilities. Summit Team partners are collaborating with the Department of Education to understand the impact of Common Core on special education teach- ers and programs, as well as on students with disabilities. Information and training opportunities are anticipated. There has also been a shift in philosophy within the Department of Education from “special education is a place” to “special ed- ucation is a continuum of services designed to support student success in the classroom. “ The implication of this shift is that more general education teachers will have stu- dents with ASD in their classrooms and need the skills to effectively support them. response to Intervention (rTI) is an ap- proach to student support implementation statewide. It states that “every student can learn, demonstrate growth, and has the right to actively participate in high quality, research-based education that maximizes their potential in the least restrictive envi- ronment.”23 Special Education will no longer be the default for struggling learners. While the concept has great potential, implemen- tation must be monitored closely to ensure students with disabilities, including those with ASD, are referred and evaluated for special education services in a timely matter when needed. A stronger focus on measurable outcomes has led the Department of Education to implement a “new” way of writing IEPs. IEPs will no longer be “deficit based.” They are instead meant to include measurable goals that demonstrate progress in key academic skills. “Instructionally appropriate IEP” infor- mation sessions were held across the state to introduce families to the new process. For students with ASD, it will be key to monitor IEP development to ensure social and other developmental skills are also addressed. RECOMMENDATIONS: Increase the ability of all IEP team members to collabo- rate and communicate for effective individual education programs. review policies and practices that support appropriate, quality education and positive outcomes for students with ASD within the public school environment. Expand family and student access to training and informa- tion on IDEA requirements, special education programs and services in order to best collaborate with school-based service providers and other IEP team members. Expand and develop models of support and in-service training programs for school personnel to meet the educa- tional needs of students with ASD. Include training specific to meeting the educational needs of students with Autism Spectrum Disorders in curricula for all educators. HEALTHCARE Health, according to the World Health organization, is a state of complete physical, mental, and so- cial well-being. People with ASD experience many barriers to achieving this definition of health.24 The changing health care environment has presented unique challenges for indi- viduals with ASD. The federal Interagency Autism Coordinating Council recently iden- tified the issues of health care disparities, service needs, and access to care as prior- ities.25 Access to affordable care and re- quired services are a crucial element of an effective, comprehensive, system of care. Many health care professionals do not feel confident treating individuals with autism, particularly youth and adults. Medical and behavioral services are very limited for Ten- nesseans with Autism who are adolescent or older.26 Health care professionals need ongoing training and support to develop and improve their ability to serve individ- uals with ASD. This includes both pre-ser- vice training and continuing education opportunities. APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS For many individuals with ASD, Applied Be- havior Analysis (ABA) and other behavioral supports are among the health care ser- vices needed, but unavailable. “The effectiveness of ABA-based interven- tion in ASD has been well documented through five decades of research by using single-subject methodology and in con- trolled studies of comprehensive early in- tensive behavioral intervention programs in university and community settings. Ac- cording to the [American Academy of Pedi- atrics], children who receive early intensive behavioral treatment have been shown to make substantial, sustained gains in IQ, lan- guage, academic performance, and adap- tive behavior as well as some measures of social behavior, and their outcomes have been significantly better than those of chil- dren in control groups.”27 Unfortunately, the 2012 Family Survey identified that ABA or behavioral support services are often not implemented.17 Fam- ilies often cited their lack of availability as the reason. This was universal to all regions of the state, but families in rural areas had even less access to behavior supports.17 LoNG-TErM SUPPorTS AND SErVICES While great strides have been made in di- agnosing ASD and addressing its impact on children and even young adults, long term supports and services remain lacking. This is true for both children and adults. Some individuals with Autism require life- long supports and services at home and in the community to achieve safe, healthy, and productive lives. The Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (DIDD) is the state agency charged with planning, developing, and implementing long-term supports and services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. However, at this time, the department only serves Tennesseans with intellectual dis- abilities. There are over 7,000 individuals on the waiting list for these services. Planning, developing, and implementing services for Tennesseans with other devel- opmental disabilities like ASD became a responsibility of the department in 2001. Despite this change to the law, no funding has been allocated, and no new services have been developed. A 2007 report of a Developmental Disabilities Task Force, es- tablished by the TN General Assembly, rec- ommended expanding the Family Support Program, establishing a Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services Waiver, and establishing a personal assistance pro- gram for those with developmental disabil- ities including ASD. FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAM The Tennessee Family Support Program is a flexible, family-friendly program that supports Tennesseans with all types of severe disabilities including ASD to live in their own homes and communities. Family Support is a very cost-effective program that helps to prevent many people from needing more expensive programs. The program serves approximately 4,500 indi- viduals and families. Approximately 3,000 families are on the waiting list. operated by DIDD with a maximum allocation of $4000 and an average allocation of $1600, this is a supplemental, rather than a long term ser- vice, but nonetheless, is an important sup- port for families who are able to access it. HEALTHCArE Tennessee needs a more robust system of long term supports and services. The focus should be on a service array that is community-based, person-centered, and flexible enough to provide supports in the context of an individual’s life situ- ation. In effect, a system that builds on and strengthens natural supports in the family and community. EXISTING AND EMErGING MoDELS INSUrANCE CoVErAGE For APPLIED BEHAVIor ANALySIS (ABA) Adequate insurance coverage is the cen- terpiece of any discussion on healthcare financing options for individuals with ASD. Most private insurance in Ten- nessee does not cover ABA or does not cover it at sufficient levels. The recom- mended amount of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) varies according to indi- vidual needs. However, Behavior Analyst Certification Board Guidelines suggest that comprehensive ABA requires be- tween 26-40 hours per week.28 “Although the recommended number of hours of therapy may seem arduous to some parents of young children, it should be noted that time spent away from therapy may move children even farther away from desired normal de- velopmental trajectories. Such delays will likely result in increased costs and greater dependence on more intensive services across their life span.”28 The District of Columbia and 35 states have implemented insurance mandates that specifically require insurers to cov- er treatments for ASD. Stakeholders in Tennessee, led by families, have been working to expand insurance coverage for ABA in Tennessee. TENNESSEE APPLIED BEHAVIor ANALySIS LICENSUrE over the past 10 years, the field of ap- plied behavior analysis (ABA) has experi- enced extraordinary growth. More indi- viduals and families are seeking ABA and the number of available practitioners has jumped as well. It is critical that all those who provide behavioral supports and ABA are qualified to do so. In order to protect consumers, the Tennessee General Assembly passed a law to create a process of licensing ABA practitioners. This will result in the requirement that only those licensed by the state board can advertise them- selves to the public as “applied behavior analysts.” The law also provides services defin\itions for the “scope of practice” of licensed applied behavior analysts. RECOMMENDATIONS Expand ongoing training and support for health care practitioners to develop and improve their ability to serve individuals with ASD. Develop a flexible program of home and community-based long term supports and services for individuals with ASD. Expand access to comprehensive Applied Behavior Analysis needed through insurance reform. respond to rapidly changing best practices and emerging knowledge and incorporate evidence –based practices. This world is not ready to welcome my son. A son who will one day outlive me. A son whom I fear will not, if needed, be cared for by those with good hearts and a desire to allow him as much independence as he is able. ~Mother of a young adult with ASD AGING AND ADULTHooD ASD is a lifelong condition. The majority of a person’s life is spent in adulthood. Preparing for adulthood and transitioning to adult life are just the beginning. Challenges remain. oppor- tunities for skill development, employ- ment, self-advocacy, social networking, and needed supports must be made available. The desired outcome is a life of one’s choosing, rooted in interdepen- dence, meaningful contributions, and inclusion. Transition and adult services are areas where collaboration between private businesses and public partners can produce innovative ways to maximize the unique potential of each individual with ASD. To be successful, policies, systems and services need to be coor- dinated. They must support early plan- ning with youth and families for the transition from youth to adulthood. research shows that this transition process is especially difficult for youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Ser- vices are much more available for chil- dren and youth than for adults with ASD. Data from the Family Survey af- firmed that parents and adults often feel they “have been dropped off a cliff” once an individual reaches adulthood. EDUCATION Transition planning with the student’s IEP Team must begin at age fourteen, if not before. It should involve the student, all caregivers, and a representative from each of the service providers who will have a role in this student’s transition. This may or may not include vocational rehabilitation but must include parents and/or family members closest to the student. Students should be provided with information about options for self-di- recting their IEP and resources to take as large a role as possi-ble in directing their transition planning process. Before leaving the education system, schools must prepare students with ASD with the basic skills required for work or for additional education or training. All students should receive information about employment options and have access to ca- reer counseling and specific skill-building programs. Co-op and work-based learning programs should be also be available to all students with ASD. Education and post-secondary education needs to be strengthened. Expanded pub- lic/private partnerships with employers in the community may be an effective way to address skills and job-readiness. Students should have the opportunity to learn ca- reer skills in professional settings outside the classroom. Vocational rehabilitation Services in the state of Tennessee are offered through the Department of Human Services. It is posi- tioned to serve young adults throughout the transition process but lacks capacity to meet the growing demand. Individuals with ASD need access to the support, accommodations, and tools they need to be successful in the classroom and workplace. HEALTH CArE Families and youth need support and guid- ance from health care providers to make the challenging switch from pediatric to adult practitioners. This includes helping transfer as much health care decision-mak- ing as possible to the individual. Behavioral and mental health resources that meet the needs of adults with ASD are often difficult to access, and adult health professionals may not have the training and supports they need to provide ser- vices. A system of care must build capac- ity to support the population of new adult patients with special needs relative to their diagnosis of ASD. Interactions in the community, particularly with law enforcement officers and other first responders, were a topic of interest during each Community Conversation. A number of disturbing incidents could have been avoided had proper understanding of the manifestation of ASD been more wide- spread. SELF-ADVOCACY Self-advocacy is an important skill set for all adults, and one that must be specifically fostered in children and youth with ASD. Peer groups, advocacy groups, and supple- mental education and independent living skills classes should be available to every student with ASD. LoNG TErM SUPPorTS AND SErVICES Successful community living for many adults with ASD requires long term sup- ports and services. Lack of services and supports in Tennessee is a significant problem. Currently, there are no home- and community-based waiver supports for individuals with ASD who have IQs over 70, and a waiting list of nearly 7000 for individ- uals with IQs under 70. EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNErSHIPS In 2011, Walgreens, the nation’s largest drugstore chain, launched their retail Em- ployees with Disabilities Initiative (rEDI) to help create more job opportunities for Americans with disabilities. The program trains candidates on the work and retail skills needed to serve in positions at Wal- greens and has hired hundreds of success- ful trainees. Project SEArCH High School Transition Pro- gram is a one year school-to-work program that immerses the student in the workplace and provides training. This program was developed at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and has been adapted to sites across the country. Project opportunity at Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt was based on the Project SEArCH model. This pro- gram provides tuition-free job training and employment opportunities within Vander- bilt. Candidates are youths with disabilities, including ASD, who qualify for State Voca- tional rehabilitation Services. TENNESSEEWorKS PArTNErSHIP TennesseeWorks is a collaboration of agencies and organizations working together to improve employment out- comes for young people with disabil- ities. The Vanderbilt Kennedy Center serves as the administrative lead for the grant. Parent support organizations, dis- ability nonprofits, employment-related agencies, and state partners include the Departments of Education, Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Health, Human Services Division of rehabilita- tion Services, Labor and Workforce De- velopment, and the TN Council on De- velopmental Disabilities, and TN Higher Education Commission. The goals of TennesseeWorks are system-wide and include raising expec- tations for employment outcomes of individuals with disabilities (including ASD), strengthening transition planning, and educating the job candidate and employer community about the bene- fits of working and hiring people with disabilities. FAMILy AND CoNSUMEr orGANIZATIoNS Family and consumer-based organi- zations are the leading providers of advocacy training for parents and individuals with disabilities. Statewide examples include Support and Train- ing for Exceptional Parents (STEP, inc.) which offers workshops to empower individuals and families to make edu- cational decisions. They also provide one-on-one assistance and training for students in transition about their options for adult services. Family Voic- es of Tennessee also works to support parents and students as they navigate their health care and educational tran- sition process to adulthood. Six Centers for Independent Living across the state of Tennessee may serve as a resource for youth and adults with ASD for advocacy, peer support, and independent living skills training. The Tennessee Council on Develop- mental Disabilities offers a free lead- ership and advocacy training program for adults with disabilities and family members called Partners in Policymak- ing. FIrST rESPoNDErS The Tennessee Department of Mental Health is developing a training pro- gram for Law Enforcement Personnel. They requested resources from the Tennessee Autism Summit Team and Autism Tennessee to incorporate information about ASD and how to serve an individual on the spectrum in an emergency. Adapting and im- plementing this training model for all first response agencies could begin to meet the needs of the professional and the individual on the spectrum. RECoMMENDATIoNS Align policies, systems and services to support early planning with youth and families for the transition from youth to adult- hood. Empower individuals across the spectrum to take responsibility to make and implement their life choices. Provide access to the tools, supports and accommodations need- ed for independence, productivity and community life. Train all first responders and emergency personnel to interact and support individuals with ASD. MoVING AHEAD Autism is a complex disorder that has a crosscutting impact on the people and public policy of our state. National data depict the explosive growth of ASD and data gathered in Tennessee have identifed the critical mass that the system and our community is facing. We need new action to address the emergent needs of individuals, families and ser- vice providers affected by ASD. Tennessee has the building blocks for an effective system of care and the Autism Summit Team recommends that our state government establish an interagency team to coordinate them. Dedicating the financing, staff time and expertise to a formal team would move ahead the implementation process by leaps and bounds. This team would be positioned to lead the development of a comprehensive, coordinated system of care for children and youth with ASD. Serving as the focal point of statewide efforts, this team could develop cohesive recommendations for the Administration and the Tennessee General Assembly as they address the epi- demic of Autism. The team would be responsible for setting milestones and timelines for the planning process and overseeing progress toward those goals. As the system of care grows, the team could coordinate state agencies, universities, non-profits and service providers to im- prove community access to information and resources. We must build our state’s capacity to support the new and the aging generation of individuals with ASD so that they may live quality, independent and productive lives alongside their peers. The Tennessee Autism Summit Team is committed to this effort and our strongest recommendation is that an inter- agency team in state government lead us on from here. APPENDIX A 1. Autism Summit Team Membership [See Appendix B] 2. In response to a legislative inquiry, the Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury, offices of research and Education Accountability (orEA) authored three reports about public services for infants, children, and youth with autism in the state. Published between 2009-2012, the series was divided into public policy areas directly connected to autism services (i.e., data collection, education, and healthcare services). Part 1 includes an overview of autism as a disability and associated laws, and a review of autism data collection and prevalence estimates. Part 2 includes an overview of the special education process and associated laws, and includes approach- es being taken by Tennessee and other states to prepare teachers and school staff to educate children with autism. Part 3 covers issues related to state and federal health-related programs and laws that intersect with the state and federal special education pro- grams in Tennessee. These include federal laws, funding mechanisms, and treatments. This series may be accessed at: http://www. comptroller.tn.gov/orea/PublicationDetails.aspx?reportKey=e7d186c5-eaa3-4616-8328-43ef1a917741 3. The State of Tennessee. 105th General Assembly. Tennessee Public Chapter 1062. Nashville: 2008. Web. 4. Hammett, Leisa A., Pope, rebekah. From Heartache to Hope. Nashville: Fields Publishing, Inc., 2009. Print. 5. Division of Birth Defects, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, “Screening and Diagnosis.” Autism Spec- trum Disorder (ASD). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. 6. Moran, John S., Casey, Christine G., rutledge, Teresa F., et al. “Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children aged 8 years — Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2010.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly report Surveillance Summaries 63.2 (2014): 1-21. Web. 7. Tennessee office of the Comptroller of the Treasury. offices of research and Education Accountability. Autism in Tennessee: Part 1 – An Introduction to Issues and Data Collection Methods. Woodson, Joseph. Nashville: oct 2009. Web. 8. Tennessee Department of Education. Department of Special Education. report by the State of Tennessee in accordance with Section 618 of IDEA to U.S. Department of Education, office of Special Education Programs. Nashville: 2013. Web. 9. Lutenbacher, Melanie. “2006-2007 Tennessee Statewide Survey of Families with CySHCN.” Tennessee Family-to-Family Health Infor- mation Center. Nashville: 2007. Print. 10. Lavelle Tara A., Weinstein Milton C., Newhouse Joseph P., et al. “Economic burden of childhood autism spectrum disorders.” Pediatrics 133.3 (2014). Web. 11. Shimabukuro, T., Grosse S., rice C. “Medical Expenditures for children with an autism spectrum disorder in a privately insured popu- lation.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38.3 (2008). Web. 12. United States Department of Education. National Center for Special Education research. Wave 3 parent interview and youth inter- view/survey. National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Washington: 2012. Web. 13. Tennessee office of the Comptroller of the Treasury. offices of research and Education Accountability. Autism in Tennessee: Part 2 – Education. Woodson, Joseph. Nashville: Dec 2010. Web. 14. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the United States federal law governing how states serve the early interven- tion and special education needs of children with disabilities. IDEA also guarantees a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment (LrE). 15. Trainor, Audrey A., Carter, Erik W., Swedeen, Beth, Pickett, Kelly. “Community Conversations: An approach for expanding and con- necting opportunities for employment for adolescents with disabilities.” Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individu- als 35.1 (2012): 50-60. Sage Journals. Web. 16. Bradfield, Cory. “Community Conversations: Utilizing the World Cafe Method to Assess the State of ASD Care in Tennessee.” Tennessee Disability Coalition. 2012. Print. 17. Hodapp, robert M., Mello, Maria., Goldman, Samantha E., Urbano, richard C. “Toward Coordinated Services for Tennessee’s Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A report to Tennessee’s Autism Summit Team.” Vanderbilt Kennedy Center. 2012. Print. 18. The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-revised (M-CHAT-r) is a scientifically validated tool for screening children between 16 and 30 months of age for symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder. To improve the accuracy of the M-CHAT-r, the authors developed a structured M-CHAT-r Follow-up Interview with questions. The Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and young Children (STAT) is an empirically derived, interactive measure developed for screening children between 24 and 36 months of age for symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder. These are just two of the standardized screening tools that are considered effective by the medical community. Screening tools do not provide a diagnosis, but help to determine whether additional investigation and a diagnostic evaluation by clinicians with expertise in developmental pediatrics is necessary. 19. Nielson, Marci. “Defining the Medical Home.” Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative. 2013. Web. 20. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is the lead agency for the “Healthy People” initiative. For the past 30 years, Healthy People has been committed to improving the quality of our Nation’s health by producing a framework for public health prevention priorities and actions. Healthy People 2020 represents the nation’s new 10-year goals and objectives for health promotion and disease prevention. Topic areas for improvement include “Access to Services” and “Disability and Health.” Accessed at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objec- tives/2020-Topics-and-objectives-objectives-A-Z 21. Murphy, Nancy A., Carbone, Paul S., Council on Children with Disabilities, “Parent-Provider-Community Partnerships: optimizing outcomes for Children with Disabilities.” Pediatrics 128.4 (2011): Web. 22. Gilman, Patricia. The Anti-romantic Child: A Memoir of Unexpected Joy. New york: Harper Perennial, 2011. Print. 23. response to Intervention (rTI) is a method used to provide early, systematic assistance to children who are having difficulty learning. It is a multi-tier approach intended to match student need and modify based on progress. rTI was included in the 2006 office of Special Education and rehabilitative Services regulations intended to assist states with implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). 24. World Health Assembly. World Health organization. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health organization. International Health Conference. New york: 22 June 1946. Web. 25. Dawson, Geraldine. “IACC Tackles Health Disparities and Access to Care.” Autism Speaks. 1 Feb 2013. Web. 26. Vahabzadeh, Arshya. “Minority Children with Autism Lack Access to Specialists.” CNN. 17 June 2013. Web 27. Tennessee office of the Comptroller of the Treasury. offices of research and Education Accountability. Autism in Tennessee: Part 3 – Health. Wright, Doug. Nashville: May 2012. Web. 28. “Guidelines: Health Plan Coverage of Applied Behavior Analysis Treatment for Autism Spectrum Disorder.” Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc., 2012. Web. APPENDIX B The Tennessee Autism Summit Team began in 2009 with the leadership of the Tennessee Boling Center on Developmental Disabilities and the Vanderbilt Kennedy Center. As of october 2014, the Team is co-chaired by Fred Palmer, M.D., and Tyler reimschisel, M.D. The follow- ing is a current list of Team members. William Allen, PhD bill.allen@cherokeehealth.com (423) 587-7337 Licensed Psychologist; VP, Children’s Services Cherokee Health Systems Tracy (Pendergrass) Beard tracy.pendergrass@vanderbilt.edu (615) 875-5084 Assistant Director Tennessee Disability Pathfinder Alyce Benson, LCSW abenson@gmail.com Chattanooga Autism Center Alternate: Dave Buck (buck.dave@gmail.com) Cory Bradfield Project LAUNCH Tennessee Department of Health cory.bradfield@tn.gov Joyce Bridges Joyce.bridges@comcast.net (615) 612-1448 (work), (615) 519-3867 (cell) Director, Child Care resource and referral Network Signal Centers Laura Baylot Casey, Ph.D., BCBA-D lpcasey@memphis.edu Associate Professor of Education University of Memphis Tom Cheetham, MD, FAAIDD thomas.cheetham@tn.gov (615) 253-6711 Deputy Commissioner of Health Services Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities David Cihak, Ph.D. dcihak@utk.edu (865) 974-4156 Assistant Professor of Theory and Practice in Teacher Education, Modified and Early Childhood Special Education Program University of Tennessee-Knoxville Gail Crawford Gail.crawford@tn.gov Tennessee Department of Human Services David Crnobori, M.S.Ed. david.crnobori@vanderbilt.edu (615) 936-0249 Educational Consultant Division of Developmental Medicine Monroe Carrel Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt Erin Do erin.do@cot.tn.gov (615) 401-7889 Principal Legislative research Analyst Comptroller’s office of research & Ed Accountability Lise Earwood Lise.earwood@tn.gov Tennessee Early Intervention Services, State of Tennessee Avis Easley avis.easley@tn.gov (615) 253-6397 Mental Health Planning Coordinator Tennessee Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services LaTamara Garrett, BA latamara.garrett@vanderbilt.edu, (615) 343-2226 Program Coordinator, Early Childhood Training Vanderbilt Kennedy Center TrIAD Deborah Gatlin, MD deborah.gatlin@tn.gov Chief Medical officer Department of Children’s Services (Foster Care) Joan C. Grim jgrim2@utk.edu (865) 974-4155 University of Tennessee Early Childhood Special Education Theory and Practice in Teacher Education Carrie Hobbs Guiden cguiden@thearctn.org (615) 248-5878 ext. 14 Executive Director The Arc Tennessee Jenny redding Gustafson jenny.redding@vanderbilt.edu (615) 936-7075 Educational Consultant Center on Secondary Education for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (CSESA) Vanderbilt University Linda Hartbarger linda.hartbarger@tn.gov Tennnessee Early Intervention Services Director Tennessee Department of Education Margaret Headrick, MS Margaret.Headrick@tn.gov (865) 609-3592 Autism resource Specialist, Division of Special Education, office of Early Childhood Tennessee Department of Education Lynnette Henderson Lynnette.henderson@vanderbilt.edu (615) 936-0448 research Participant Coordinator, Associate Director of Community Services, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center Dee Hitz, oB/GyN NP, rN Dee.hitz@tn.gov (615) 741-2703 Nurse Consultant, Children’s Special Services Tennessee Department of Health Belinda Hotchkiss belinda_h@tndisability.org (615) 383-9442 Director, Family Voices of Tennessee, Tennessee Disability Coalition Cheri Howlett Cah37849@aol.com Parent, Autism Society of America- East Tennessee Chapter Past President open Doors Tennessee, Powell TN Quentin Humberd, MD quentin.humberd@bellsouth.net (270) 798-8194 (W), (931) 206-4403 (M) Medical Director Tennessee Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics Sarah Hunt Sarah.hunt@cdctn.org (931) 684-2149 ext. 104 Community Development Center Jacqueline Johnson, MPA jacqueline.johnson@tn.gov (615) 741-0361 Public Health Program Director, Children’s Special Services, Tennessee Department of Health Pablo Juárez, MEd, BCBA pablo.juarez@vanderbilt.edu (615) 343-4116 Associate Director, TrIAD; Assistant Professor, Pediatrics & Psychiatry, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center Whitney Loring, PsyD whitney.a.loring@vanderbilt.edu,(615) 343-6153 Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, DDM Vanderbilt Kennedy Center TrIAD Loraine Lucinski, MPH loraine.lucinski@tn.gov (615) 532-8041 Maternal & Child Health Program Tennessee Department of Health Beth Malow, M.D. beth.malow@vanderbilt.edu Burry Chair in Cognitive Childhood Development, Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics, Director of Vanderbilt Autism Treatment Network Site Family Member, Autism Tennessee James McCarten mccarten@burr.com (615) 383-3345 Family Member, Autism Tennessee Elise McMillan, JD elise.mcmillan@vanderbilt.edu (615) 343-2540 Co-Director of UCEDD Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University Kathryn McVicar, MD kmcvicar@uthsc.edu kathryn.mcvicar@utmg.org (901) 287-5207 Asst Prof of Clinical Pediatrics and Child Neurology University of Tennessee Health Science Center Cecilia Melo-romie cecilia.melo-romie@vanderbilt.edu (615) 479-9568 Hispanic outreach Coordinator, VKC UCEDD Vanderbilt Kennedy Center Jeanine C. Miller, PhD, SPE-HSP Jeanine.C.Miller@tn.gov (615) 253-8370 Director, Division of Policy, office of Policy and Innovation, Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Scott Modell, Ph.D. scott.modell@tn.gov (615) 253-5688 Deputy Commissioner, Child Safety Tennessee Department of Children’s Services russell Moore, PhD russell.moore@cot.tn.gov (615) 401-7880 Asst Dir Education Accountability Tennessee Comptroller’s office of research and Ed Accountability Janis Neece JGNeece@etch.com East Tennessee Children’s Hospital Cassandra Newsom, Psy.D. cassandra.r.newsom@vanderbilt.edu (615) 343-5753 Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental Medicine; TrIAD Director of Psychological Education Jill omer jill.omer@tn.gov Speech, Language & Autism Coordinator Tennessee Department of Education Fred Palmer, MD fpalmer@uthsc.edu (901) 448-6512, (901) 277-7844 (M) Shainberg Professor of Pediatrics, Director of Boling Center for Developmental Disabilities University of Tennessee Health Science Center Amanda Peltz amanda@autismtn.org (615) 385-2077 Executive Director Autism Tennessee Elaine Piper elaine_piper@signalcenters.org Tennessee Child Care resource & referral Network Tyler reimschisel, MD tyler.reimschisel@vanderbilt.edu (615) 936-0269 Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Neurology; Director of Division of Developmental Medicine; Director of Vanderbilt LEND; Assoc. Director, Pediatric residency Program; Vice Chair for Education, Department of Pediatrics Jill r. (richardson) rigsby, MS jill.rigsby@tn.gov (615) 532-1639 Training & Workforce Development Coordinator Department of Education, Division of Special Education, office of Early Childhood represented by Lise Earwood while on leave rebecca robinson rebecca.robinson@tnaap.org, (865) 657-3737 Training Coordinator Tennessee Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics Mary rolando mary.e.rolando@tn.gov, (615) 253-3199 Health Advocacy Director Tennessee Department of Children’s Services Susan H. rollyson, M.Ed. susan.rollyson@tnaap.org (615) 956-7815 Training Coordinator Tennessee Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics Jan rosemergy, PhD jan.rosemergy@vanderbilt.edu, (615) 322-8238 VKC Deputy Director; Director of Communications and Dissemination, VKC IDDrC & VKC UCEDD Vanderbilt Kennedy Center Jenness roth, M.Ed. jroth11@uthsc.edu (901) 448-3737 Family Faculty Coordinator Boling Center for Developmental Disabilities University of Tennessee Health Science Center Alexander Santana alexander.santana@vanderbilt.edu (615) 875-5083 Program Coordinator Vanderbilt Kennedy Center UCEDD Multicultural Program Janet Shouse janet.shouse@vanderbilt.edu (615) 875-5080 Vanderbilt Kennedy Center UCEDD Disability Employment Specialist; E-Toolkit for Primary Care of Adults with DD Family Member, Autism Tennessee John Shouse jmshouse@bellsouth.net (615) 385-2077, (615) 476-7472 (M) Family Member, Autism Tennessee Ned Solomon ned.solomon@tn.gov (615) 532-6556 Director, Partners in Policymaking Tennessee Council on Developmental Disabilities Family Member, Autism Tennessee Karen Harrison director@tnstep.org (423) 639-0125 ext.11 Executive Director, Support and Training for Exceptional Parents (STEP, inc.) Courtney Taylor, MDiv courtney.taylor@vanderbilt.edu (615) 322-5658 Associate Director of Communications and Dissemination, VKC IDDrC and UCEDD Anita Teague Anita.Teague@cdctn.org (931) 684-8681 ext. 128 Executive Director, Community Development Center Susanne Tropez-Sims, MD stsims@mmc.edu (615) 327-6925 Professor of Pediatrics, Meharry Medical College Michael Warren, MD, MPH, FAAP michael.d.warren@tn.gov (615) 741-7305 Director of Family Health and Wellness Tennessee Department of Health Zachary Warren, Ph.D. zachary.warren@vanderbilt.edu (615) 936-7159 Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Psychiatry, and Special Ed- ucation; Director, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center TrIAD; Director, Autism Clinical Services Lauren Weaver lauren.weaver@vanderbilt.edu TrIAD organizational outreach Coordinator, Behavioral/Educa- tional Consultant, and Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Carol Westlake carol_w@tndisability.org (615) 383-9442 Executive Director Tennessee Disability Coalition John J. Wheeler, Ph.D. wheelerjj@etsu.edu (423) 439-4196 Director - Center of Excellence in Early Childhood Learning and Development Professor of Special Education East Tennessee State University Toni M. Whitaker, MD Tennessee Act Early Ambassador twhitak1@uthsc.edu (901) 448-6511 Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Boling Center for Developmental Disabilities University of Tennessee Health Science Center Teresa Winnette teresa.winnette@cdctn.org Community Development Center Shelbyville, TN Douglas Wright Douglas.W.Wright@cot.tn.gov offices of research & Education Accountability Comptroller of the Treasury rachel Wright rwrigh15@utk.edu University of Tennessee ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Tennessee Autism Plan represents the work of many. Led by the Autism Summit Team, critical input was provided by advocacy and support groups, families and individuals who have ASD and the professionals who serve them. Special thanks to Terri Urbano and Jan rosemergy of the Vanderbilt Kennedy Center and Carol Westlake of the Tennessee Disability Coalition for helping to bring this project to fruition. To Cory Bradfield for his leadership as Project Coordinator for the Tennessee Autism Plan. To Autism Tennessee and Howard T. Ezell Photography for use of their fantastic photos. To Sarah Sampson of the Tennessee Disability Coalition for her excellent design, writing and editing and Victor Judge for his copy editing. The recommendations made herein represent years of work collating experiences and expertise yet we sincerely hope they are only the beginning.